Competitions or Give-aways?
So for February, we gave a Vittoria Zaffiro to the highest rated bike. However, since the ratings are getting hacked, we’re going to make some changes in the future and instead have give-aways for bikes we choose worthy.
- Underdogs
- Mannie’s Bianchi (1.75 out of 5)
- Today’s K (1.75 out of 5)
- Jeffro’s Haro (1.78 out of 5)
- Nick’s Bianchi (2.00 out of 5)
- Massimo’s Fixie (2.00 out of 5)
- Top Bikes
- Otto’s Dream Works (4.09 out of 5)
- Brian’s Aegis (3.63 out of 5)
- Mad Motion’s Cinelli (3.57 out of 5)
- Tomo’s Cinelli (3.53 out of 5)
- Rudy’s Schwinn (3.45 out of 5)
- Most Viewed
- Tony’s Leader 4,341 views
- Richs’ Bianchi 3,508 views
- Jason’s Fixie 3,447 views
- Justin’s Felt 2,936 views
- Kenny’s Motobecane 2,652 views
© 2009-2010 Your Daily Fixed. All Rights Reserved. Bikes Submit Blog About
I think this is a horrible idea.
we should let the people decide what they like.
this is america!
not china!
the people run the country not one group!
kanye ftw!
Give-aways don’t seem fair either, can there be another way?
The rating system would work if only we could ensure ONE PERSON ONE VOTE… but with computers it’s impossible! “the people” aren’t deciding anything, plus I’ve seen the tightest bikes on here start out with “1’s” right off the bat, that’s bullsh-t bush league freshman class president hater voting. What can be done?
It’s true. I feel the users of this website should choose which bike they like the best to win. With douche bags hacking in and ruining it because they think in some way it’s cool, it makes it really had. So I challenge the people opposed to the change to come up with a better way to decide it that can’t be hacked, or at least as easily. It becomes the lesser of two evils. I think people running the website could be biased, yes, but then again who isn’t? Whoever is hacking the site is biased as well, so it can’t really be remedied any other way.